مقالات تخصصی پزشکی

ترجمه مقاله تخصصی پزشک

مقالات تخصصی پزشکی

ترجمه مقاله تخصصی پزشک

مقاله پزشکی 8 - استفاده از آسپیرین برای پیشگیری از بیماری کرونری قلب

مقاله ای که در زیر به شما ارائه می شود با هدف تعیین آستانه های ریسک قلبی عروقی و کرونری که آسپیرین در آن به عنوان عامل پیشگیری اصلی بیماری کرونرری قلبی ایمن محسوب میشود، انجام شده است. این تحقیق از یک فراتحلیل در مورد آزمون های کنترل شده تصادفی آسپیرین برای پیشگیری اولیه برگرفته شده است. برای سفارش ترجمه مقاله به شکل فوری یا عادی می توانید از لینک دوستان ما در بخش پیوندها استفاده کنید و با ذکر بازدید کننده وبلاگ ما بودن از تخفیف مناسب برخوردار شوید.


OBJECTIVE To determine the cardiovascular and coronary risk thresholds at which aspirin for primary prevention of coronary heart disease is safe and worthwhile.

DESIGN Meta-analysis of four randomised controlled trials of aspirin for primary prevention. The benefit and harm from aspirin treatment were examined to determine: (1) the cardiovascular and coronary risk threshold at which benefit in prevention of myocardial infarction exceeds harm from significant bleeding; and (2) the absolute benefit expressed as number needed to treat (NNT) for aspirin net of cerebral haemorrhage and other bleeding complications at different levels of coronary risk.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Benefit from aspirin, expressed as reduction in cardiovascular events, myocardial infarctions, strokes, and total mortality; harm caused by aspirin in relation to significant bleeds and major haemorrhages.

RESULTS Aspirin for primary prevention significantly reduced all cardiovascular events by 15% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6% to 22%) and myocardial infarctions by 30% (95% CI 21% to 38%), and non-significantly reduced all deaths by 6% (95% CI −4% to 15%). Aspirin non-significantly increased strokes by 6% (95% CI −24% to 9%) and significantly increased bleeding complications by 69% (95% CI 38% to 107%). The risk of major bleeding balanced the reduction in cardiovascular events when cardiovascular event risk was 0.22%/year. The upper 95% CI for this estimate suggests that harm from aspirin is unlikely to outweigh benefit provided the cardiovascular event risk is 0.8%/year, equivalent to a coronary risk of 0.6%/year. At coronary event risk 1.5%/year, the five year NNT was 44 to prevent a myocardial infarction, and 77 to prevent a myocardial infarction net of any important bleeding complication. At coronary event risk 1%/year the NNT was 67 to prevent a myocardial infarction, and 182 to prevent a myocardial infarction net of important bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS Aspirin treatment for primary prevention is safe and worthwhile at coronary event risk ⩾ 1.5%/year; safe but of limited value at coronary risk 1%/year; and unsafe at coronary event risk 0.5%/year. Advice on aspirin for primary prevention requires formal accurate estimation of absolute coronary event risk.

مقاله پزشکی 7- کیفیت زندگی بیماران دارای نارسائی قلبی احتقانی

در این مقاله پزشکی که چکیده ان را برای شما دوستان منتشر کرده ایم.  به ارزیابی سلامت بیماران مبتلا به نارسائی قلبی احتقانی پرداخته می شود و یکفیت زندگی آنها با جمعیت عمومی و افاردی که به بیماری های مزمن دیگر مبتلا هستند مقایسه می شود و جنبه های کفیت زندگی متغیرهای بدنی مرتبط با آنها نیز نیز بررسی می شود. این  تحقیق یک تحقیق بیمارستانی است و می تواند نتایج مهمی در بهبود کیفیت زندگی این دسته از بیماران قلبی داشته باشد. برای سفارش ترجمه این مقاله پزشکی می توانید از سایت هایی که در بخش پیوندها درج شده اند استفاده کنید و با ذکر نام این وبلاگ از تخفیف ویژه برخوردار شوید


Objective: To assess health related quality of life of patients with congestive heart failure; to compare their quality of life with the previously characterised general population and in those with other chronic diseases; and to correlate the different aspects of quality of life with relevant somatic variables.

Setting: University hospital.

Patients and design: A German version of the generic quality of life measure (SF-36) containing eight dimensions was administered to 205 patients with congestive heart failure and systolic dysfunction. Cardiopulmonary evaluation included assessment of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, peak oxygen uptake, and the distance covered during a standardised six minute walk test.

Results: Quality of life significantly decreased with NYHA functional class (linear trend: p < 0.0001). In NYHA class III, the scores of five of the eight quality of life domains were reduced to around one third of those in the general population. The pattern of reduction was different in patients with chronic hepatitis C and major depression, and similar in patients on chronic haemodialysis. Multiple regression analysis showed that only the NYHA functional class was consistently and closely associated with all quality of life scales. The six minute walk test and peak oxygen uptake added to the explanation of the variance in only one of the eight quality of life domains (physical functioning). Left ventricular ejection fraction, duration of disease, and age showed no clear association with quality of life.

Conclusions: In congestive heart failure, quality of life decreases as NYHA functional class worsens. Though NYHA functional class was the most dominant predictor among the somatic variables studied, the major determinants of reduced quality of life remain unknown.